It is St. Patrick’s Day. It should be a day of celebration of snakes being purged from Ireland and the merriment of green shamrocks and alcohol consumption. Perhaps there is still time for me to enjoy a Guinness or two, but instead, I’ve been scrolling Twitter only to find “conservatives” supporting Dave Rubin’s announcement that he and his “husband” are “expecting” two children. Page after page of Conservative, Inc. types falling over themselves, cheering for an egocentric and anti-human attempt at playing God, no different than something from Jurassic Park. “It’s freedom, man.” “Why do you care?” “Fuck off, you religious bigot.” These are the cries you see from the midwits supporting this bullshit. This whole exercise has brought to my attention another “snake in the grass,” burrowed in the psyche not just of conservative circles but also of the Dissident Right: feminism.
I want to preface this by saying that I have nothing but respect for members of this community who come from a more religious perspective. I was very honored to share a stage and speak with many of them at the U.S. Scyldings Event. They all possess exceptional intellect and prose. Any disagreements expressed below are held in good faith and with only the highest respect for those I have been fortunate enough to have met. This piece is meant to show a major blind spot that I see in tackling what is, in my view, the most important issue the West faces today.
Two core values of the Right are hierarchy and anti-egalitarianism. You will hear constant arguing over the differences of cultures, races, ethnicities, political formulas, and — on the surface level — the sexes. Everyone on the Right claims that men and women are different, but more often than not, this conversation will devolve into transgender bathrooms, the wage gap, and men and women’s sports. Sprinkle in points regarding how families are good and how men are failing, and that’s right-wing gender discussion in a nutshell for you. You’ll hear constant discussion on how men need to “man up,” take more responsibility, return to the church, stop watching porn, and step up to save the West. While these are all valid, you’ll notice one thing lacking in this laundry list of points: ACCOUNTABILITY AMONG WOMEN.
Despite all the talk of being trad and returning to family life, the Right has a massive blank-slate blind spot when it comes to men and women. No more is this on display than in the conversation of premarital sex and promiscuity between the genders. There is endless cope on the Right: that sex affects men and women the same, and that both genders should treat it the same way. This is simply not the case. Men and women are different, right down to our brain waves and muscle fibers. It is ridiculous to suggest that men are ruined for marriage in the same way women are if they have had many sexual partners. It’s not true. Not only are women attracted to men who are sexually successful, but it is also imperative for a man to know how to navigate the sexual marketplace and women’s nature, given the state of intersexual dynamics today. It is simply IMPOSSIBLE for a man to understand his own nature and woman’s nature without getting in the trenches and finding out firsthand. It is not something you can learn from a book, and it can quite literally cost you your life if you are unprepared.
I joined Academic Agent and many other notable figures in our circles for the Christmas party stream last year. Many topics were discussed throughout the six-hour stream, one of which was concerning the life path of men. During that discussion, FuriusPertinax brought up the Romans and how “family life” was a set period during a man’s life. A man was to take a wife after he had seen battle, after he had traveled the world, and after he had gained skills and wisdom. After a man had made something of himself, he was then allowed to take a wife and start a family. I would absolutely encourage such a system: a system in which men go out into the world, make something of themselves, and also learn women’s nature and how to establish a strong frame into which a woman would fall. It is only in recent history that men and women would settle with people their own age. It is natural for older men to take younger wives. I would also unironically have right-wing men, under the friend-enemy distinction, take war brides from the weak men of the Left. Have young men go out into the world and cut their teeth on the vast number of promiscuous women that modernity has created in order to level up and take a right-wing woman as a bride. We need incentives for top men to join our ranks, and sex is the greatest motivator for men there is. Feminism has destroyed male-female relationships that have lasted for thousands of years. There is no way around it. We are going to have to break some eggs to make this omelet, despite the screams of the religious Right.
Feminism has always been an ideology of revenge and supremacy. It was never about equality. My friend Kenziepuff (Mack and Liberty) made a great video about the history of feminism that details the crimes of the original suffragettes, and the lies of feminism that we have been told. Feminism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. We have the highest divorce rates and the lowest marriage rates ever. We have the highest rates of single motherhood, the highest rates of sexless men, and the highest rates of anti-depressant use among women. We have women who have been forced into the workforce and political institutions, and that has directly resulted in more socialism, Covid lockdowns, stagnant wages, abortion on demand, and wokeism pushed at every turn. We live in a gynocracy where emotionalism is king, and where offending and judging someone is the crime of the century. The Right claims to be against all these things, but the reflexive response is to say that it’s the fault of men and that men need to fix this. But is the Right actually willing to fix it? Do conservatives actually know what needs to be done?
Men have not held power in the West for three, if not four, generations. The sexual revolution has given Western women total control of the mating process. Birth control, abortion on demand, and court-enforced laws have rendered men defenseless. They have told men to “man down” for generations and to “come into the present” and “get with the times.” The men of today have absolutely nothing to do with the failures of women over the last sixty years. What we need now is a new generation of men to break their gynocentric programming and to take back what is ours.
What this requires is an unapologetic and unleashed form of masculinity that has been absent in the West for generations. This will require a return of Alpha men — to use Vox Day’s socio-sexual hierarchy — to the institutions of power. What we have today is a society ruled by Gammas, or in other words male feminists and white knights. And historically, the way Alpha men gain power is by crushing their enemies, seeing them driven before them, and hearing the lamentations of their women. There needs to be a return of strong Alpha men to crush the Gammas into submission.
Are conservatives willing to educate their daughters as to what their roles are, or are they going to spoil daddy’s little princess and tell her to go to college and waste her fertile years getting a degree and a job? Are conservatives willing to get out of the way of Alpha men taking war brides and expelling women from positions of power and the workforce, or will they stand in the way, on grounds of equality and freedom? Are conservatives willing to take an active role in the mate selection process for their daughters, or will they stand back and watch them make terrible mate choices? Will conservatives agree to arranged marriages, or restricting social media access, or teaching their daughters to cook, clean, and respect male authority? Are religious institutions going to give incentives for Alpha men to join their ranks? Are those churches strictly going to enforce chastity in women? Or that it’s a women’s duty to have sex with and listen to her husband? I think we all know the answer to these questions.
I have a childhood friend whom I’ve known for my entire life. He was born and raised Christian, went to a Christian school and university, never had premarital sex, and had only one serious girlfriend. He married that girl after college when they were both 22. He is now four years into his marriage. He has a house, two cars, a dog, a very good engineering job, and he’s six-foot four and jacked. Four years into his marriage, he is in a dead bedroom with no kids. Imagine working your whole life to be the top 1% of men in your age cohort and being in a sexless marriage because your wife thinks “sex is gross and only whores do that.” Now my buddy has no options. The NUMBER ONE reason men are on this Earth is sex. The whole economy runs on the male sex drive. Christians can argue all they want that it should be God as number one, but that simply isn’t cutting it for most men. My friend is stuck. He put in the hard work and became the high-value man, yet his needs aren’t being met. What is his course of action? You bet your ass that no priest will tell my friend’s wife to fulfill her wifely duties. He could get divorced and lose half of all he owns and be emotionally devastated. He could sit in misery for the rest of his days, paying for what is nothing more than a glorified roommate. He could look for a side piece, but then if that is discovered, he will be shown no mercy by his friends, his family, his church, or the court system. Any marriage counselor will be a woman telling them some bullshit about love languages, or that he should man up and do more chores, and that’ll make her attracted to him. Or he could suck-start a shotgun.
That is the future set forward for men without authority in the world. That is what “manning up” more gets you. Men need to take back authority in all aspects of the world. Women should not be captains aboard any ship in the West. They need to be removed from all positions of authority and power over men and returned to their natural roles as Man’s rib. The first mate to the man’s captain. This is not to say that there is no room for women in the Right; I have many friends in these circles who are women. Mack and Liberty, Mrs. RadLib, Daughter of Albion, Philosophicat, Po the Person, and even my archrival Birdie are all doing great work. The noblest of goals for these great women would be to push for other women to return to their natural roles, to show that being a submissive woman is natural and extremely important, and to encourage men to take back our civilization that has been stolen from us. What we need now is more warriors instead of more priests. My goal above all else is for men to reclaim their authority in the world. Conservatives can either help with that or get out of the way.
More coomer cope for how it’s acceptable for you to have sex with as many women as possible, even raping and stealing women from other men, but how women having sex is destructive to society. Pro tip: if you’re having sex with a woman, that means she’s having sex too. In healthy societies, people are held to equal standards and both sides view sex as something that can be beautiful or can ruin your life. If you’re having sex with women you don’t want children with you’re just as bad as the birth control using, baby aborting liberal whores you claim to hate so much. You’ll go on and on about accountability for women, but don’t want accountability for yourself. Same as claiming to want a hierarchy except when it comes to competing with women who you believe should be relegated to the bottom of the totem pole regardless of their intellect or work ethic or talents. Natural roles no longer exist in this modern society. You are no more naturally suited to be a lawyer, a doctor, or an accountant than a woman is. Your whole purpose with putting women back into subjugation is to gain control over women again. The fact that you post such idiotic drivel while believing that you are superior to all women just shows you to be nothing more than an entitled narcissist not deserving of any woman or any position of power or authority.
Will Knowland’s response to your essay so a schooling, summed up here:
“if men can get sex too easily, their primary motive for contributing to civilisation is removed. Why bother subjecting yourself to rigorous education and training for years to get a job that functions as a proxy to signal your ability to provide and therefore gain sexual access if you can already get sex without all that? Free love, baby.”
https://knowlandknows.substack.com/p/the-religious-right-and-feminism?s=r